The league of gentlemen
Part three of the television documentary series Pandora’s box, The league of gentlemen focuses on the governmental implementation of economic theory in Britain from the early 1960s till the late 1980s. The documentary attempts to explain how politicians attempted to recapture Britain’s glorious past and how they believed they could achieve this through scientifically proven measures. However, as political interests intervened with economic theory the economic experiments ultimately failed to halt Britain’s relative decline.Historical background
With the global economy presently in an enormous monetary crisis, experiences from former economic crises seem ever more relevant. As they did in the past, politicians and economists yet again turn for help to what they believe to be a science of money. Herein the economy is perceived to function according to a set of rational scientific rules. However, as previous experiences have taught us, the notion that complex economic systems work according to a predictable rational have often seemed unfounded in reality.
Political interest
At the heart of the economic debates and the political policies implemented accordingly lay the opposition between Keynesian economics and Monetarism. Economic and political supporters of the apposing models have always presented both models as indisputably true and mutually exclusive. Yet, the documentary explains how the political implementation of these models means that their perceived factual trueness can be used in the pursuit of an ideological interest and not the economic benefits of the nation.
Argumentation
The league of gentlemen also attempts to elucidate that transferred economic ideals that use scientific theory to strengthen their argument always originate from a very particular social-political affiliation and not one objective view on reality. In both economic models the political representatives assumed to advocate the undisputed truth by equating their claims to scientific reality. Yet, non managed to control the economic decline of Britain they set out to adjust as the models were framed within political instead of economic interests.
Pandora’s box
Pandora’s box is a six part BBC television documentary series written and produced by British television producer and documentary filmmaker Adam Curtis. Each part of the series focuses on social, political or scientific aspects of reality and examines the increasing influence and danger of political and technological rationalism.
About the filmmaker
Adam Curtis is a renowned British television producer and documentary filmmaker noted for making programmes which often make far reaching claims on grand subjects. The scale of his subject matter and his claims to the undisputable truth of his opinion often give rise to controversy. However, his documentaries always expound clear views on the subject which are structurally well argued. Curtis is known for his extensive use of archival footage and the narration his own documentaries.
Awards
Pandora’s Box won the BAFTA Award for Best Factual Series.
Scenes
- Introduction
- The introduction explains that for the last thirty years, politicians in Britain have used economic theories in an attempt to build a new prosperity. One after another, Labour and Conservative governments became convinced that if they followed what they believed were a set of scientific laws, the economy would grow faster. But instead of restoring the country’s fortunes, the economic experiments failed to halt Britain’s relative decline.
- Neddy and Keynes
- In an attempt to address Britain’s relative economic decline in the early 1960’s the Conservative governement set up the National Economic Development Council/ Office (known as Neddy). This corporatist economic planning forum would advise the government on economic policies. Their aim was to stabilize the economy by increasing government expenditures during recession and limit inflation during economic growth – otherwise known as Keynesian economics.
- Labour response to economic boom
- By 1963, the economic policies of the Conservatives had lead to an economic boom. By Keynesian reasoning the logical policy should be reducing government expenditures in order to limit inflation. However, as this clip illustrates, when Labour came to power in 1964 under Harold Wilson political convictions prompted them to continue stimulating economic growth.
- Boom out of control
- The reluctance of the 1964-1970 Labour government to devalue the pound in the mid-1960s – and thus stimulate British export – had resulted in an increase in inflation. By 1965 the economic boom was out of control and Labour tried to – to no avail – hold down wages and prices in order to limit inflation. The comments by Brian Reading of the Department of Economic Affairs (1964-1966) clearly illustrate how the intervention of political interests in economic theory thwarted the stabilization of the UK economy.
- Dash for growth
- By the early 1970s, the Conservative government under Edward Heath (1970-1974) sought to stimulate the flow of money by privatizing credit and increasing public spending. The result was something previous believed to be impossible, stagflation; inflation combined with economic stagnation. According to a growing group of economists adhering to monetarism – mainly associated with the work of Milton Friedman -, the solution lay in slowing down monetary growth.
- Monetarism in the background
- After the fall of the Conservative government under Edward Heath in 1975, monetarism began to look like a viable alternative to the Keynesian economics of the past. As this clip illustrates, monetarists such as Professor Alan Walters and Lord Keith Joseph (ab)used the economic situation by presenting doom scenarios of the economy in order to attack the Labour government in power. Lord Joseph in particular sought to translate monetarism into a political program.
- Monetarism takes centre stage
- Following the severe shock of the 1973 oil crisis and the 1973–1974 stock market crash, the British economy went into recession in 1974, with GDP falling by 1.1%. In 1976 the Labour government was granted a loan by the IMF on condition that the UK would adopt monetarist economic policies. In this clip former Labour MP Tony Benn explains that economic theories – Keynesian and/ or monetarist – are inherently infused with political interests.
- Medium term financial strategy
- This clip illustrates how, by 1978, monetarism had moved from the margins of economic theory to centre stage. Keith Joseph was the closest adviser to the leader of the new Conservative Party, Margaret Thatcher. He and other economist had drawn up and economic plan that sought to combat inflation by raising interest rates and cutting public spending.
- Monetarism worsens recession
- The economic policies of the Conservatives in the early 1980s did not halt Britain’s relative decline. The cuts in government expenditures had in fact worsened the recession. In this clip chief economic advisor Professor Charles Goodhart expresses his puzzlement about the failure of monetarist economics, while Keith Joseph continues to defend his policies. According to Thatcher’s policy advisor (1979-82) John Hoskyns, Joseph’s reluctance to amid failure stems from the fact that politicians “never admin to making mistakes.”
- The end of monetarism
- By the end of 1980, unemployment in the UK was still on the rise and the economy was declining faster than in the darkest days of the 1930. Therefore, by 1981 Alan Walters – previously an convinced monetarist – advised Prime Minister Thatcher to lower interest rates and thus move away from monetarist economic policies. However, as this clip illustrates, the entanglement of economy theory with politics could not halt the decline of an economy which seemed to be beyond control.
- Goodhart’s law
- The failure of Keynesian and monetarist economics to restore Britain’s economy had left many disillusioned about the ability to change – in a predicable way – how an economy would behave. It led chief economic advisor to the Bank of England Charles Goodhart to formulate Goodhart’s Law. As this clip illustrates, the implication of the law – encouraging a laissez-faire economy – fitted well with Conservative philosophy and 1980s egocentric culture.
- Concluding remarks
- In the concluding part of the documentary, adviser to the Treasury (1970-1974) Professor Alan Budd questions whether in the 1970s and 80s economic theories were used to disguise political policies rather than limit inflation. Economic advisor to the Bank of England Professor Charles Goodhart in turn reflects on the validity of economic theories that fail to predict or stabilize the economy.
Likes: 0
Viewed: 1













